<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The top 5 dumbest things Web developers do today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/</link>
	<description>web development, web design, technical communication information for novices and experts</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: weblizzer</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/#comment-81634</link>
		<dc:creator>weblizzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/the-top-5-dumbest-things-web-developers-do-today/#comment-81634</guid>
		<description>Very nice article, i really admitted that in developing site i prefer to tables but after i learn on css div are now the best and it's faster to load rather than tables...


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article, i really admitted that in developing site i prefer to tables but after i learn on css div are now the best and it&#8217;s faster to load rather than tables&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports Card Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/#comment-54779</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports Card Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/the-top-5-dumbest-things-web-developers-do-today/#comment-54779</guid>
		<description>Agree,
Google and other search engines can easily read flash now.  It is also very easy to spoof content to them as well (this is allowed by google and is not SEO dark magic).  The worst part of flash is linking to individual pages.  99% of flash sites do not do this properly.  How am i expected to make a page using a bookmark if the bookmark just sends me to the homepage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree,<br />
Google and other search engines can easily read flash now.  It is also very easy to spoof content to them as well (this is allowed by google and is not SEO dark magic).  The worst part of flash is linking to individual pages.  99% of flash sites do not do this properly.  How am i expected to make a page using a bookmark if the bookmark just sends me to the homepage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dikkie</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/#comment-44698</link>
		<dc:creator>Dikkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/the-top-5-dumbest-things-web-developers-do-today/#comment-44698</guid>
		<description>Well, I used to make sites in tables and/or frames.
Tables were quite easy to make. To make layout etc... to maintain, it was okay for a small site I had.

And it didn't have to be dynamic in layout because I wasn't planning to change layout often 'cause I had a good one.

Now I'm learning DIV stuff and CSS things... Quite nice, less html code... but a lot of CSS code.
And totally not cross-browser. Always problems with one of the 3 I try (FireFox, IE, Opera).
But I don't give up at the moment... I try to find the good CSS style to make it right for all browsers... Maybe impossible, but I don't give up so fast. I hope it's worth the time I spent.

Cheers!
Nice articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I used to make sites in tables and/or frames.<br />
Tables were quite easy to make. To make layout etc&#8230; to maintain, it was okay for a small site I had.</p>
<p>And it didn&#8217;t have to be dynamic in layout because I wasn&#8217;t planning to change layout often &#8217;cause I had a good one.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m learning DIV stuff and CSS things&#8230; Quite nice, less html code&#8230; but a lot of CSS code.<br />
And totally not cross-browser. Always problems with one of the 3 I try (FireFox, IE, Opera).<br />
But I don&#8217;t give up at the moment&#8230; I try to find the good CSS style to make it right for all browsers&#8230; Maybe impossible, but I don&#8217;t give up so fast. I hope it&#8217;s worth the time I spent.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Nice articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhulme</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/#comment-13539</link>
		<dc:creator>dhulme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/the-top-5-dumbest-things-web-developers-do-today/#comment-13539</guid>
		<description>Good artical, I quite agree with what you say! Especially the one about learning CSS and making flash websites. I thought CSS would be hard to learn, but once I started it was so easy! :) Much eaiser than tables in my oppinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good artical, I quite agree with what you say! Especially the one about learning CSS and making flash websites. I thought CSS would be hard to learn, but once I started it was so easy! :) Much eaiser than tables in my oppinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Predrag</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/dumb-web-design-2007/#comment-11255</link>
		<dc:creator>Predrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherjason.com/articles/the-top-5-dumbest-things-web-developers-do-today/#comment-11255</guid>
		<description>Great article. However, some search engines can read flash (like Google), but they can't figure out semanthics at all. 

Furthermore, even though Google fetches the correct wording it can't lead you to a specific page inside the Flash movie.

In other words, you are 100% right in your oppinion. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. However, some search engines can read flash (like Google), but they can&#8217;t figure out semanthics at all. </p>
<p>Furthermore, even though Google fetches the correct wording it can&#8217;t lead you to a specific page inside the Flash movie.</p>
<p>In other words, you are 100% right in your oppinion. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
